Fox News89%

Rick Harrison of 'Pawn Stars' says gambling isn't dying even as Las Vegas poker rooms close one by one 22%

By Ashley DiMella0%

4/12/2026, 12:00:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 603 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,108 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the article peer group.

The drop in Las Vegas tourism has been well-documented, with total visitor numbers down 7.5%. 
At the same time, poker rooms along the Vegas Strip are closing  raising questions about the appeal of in-person gambling. 
Rick Harrison of "Pawn Stars" fame  as well as owner of the Gold & Silver Pawn Shop in Las Vegas  told Fox News Digital in an interview that gambling in person is not dying. 
"We know what the oldest profession is  gambling was probably the second," Harrison said, laughing. 
"People always gambled  and plus, you know, in Vegas, it's just not [about] the gambling." 
LAS VEGAS POKER ROOMS FOLD AS CASINO TOURISM PLUMMETS TO RECORD LOWS 
Harrison said Las Vegas hosts certain conventions unlike anywhere else in the world, and people are coming to Sin City for more than just gambling. 
"Keep changing it around, see what sticks to the wall, give your customers what they want  and they will keep on coming back," he said. 
The latest poker room to close was Resorts World on March 30, a casino representative confirmed to Fox News Digital. 
The closure will leave just eight poker rooms open on the Las Vegas Strip, according to the blog "Vital Vegas." 
"However, we will be introducing new gaming opportunities to replace the poker room," the representative said. 
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER 
The representative did not elaborate on what new gaming offerings would take the room’s place. 
It currently features No Limit Texas Hold’em, Pot Limit Omaha and mixed games. 
"You don't have just the whole old style [where you] have blackjack tables, [it’s] dark and everything else like that," said Harrison. 
He credited Circa Resort & Casino for changing it up. 
"You go down to Circa [and] there's go-go dancers dancing behind the blackjack tables. 
It makes it more fun," he said. 
Las Vegas Strip gaming revenue fell 11% year over year, from $840,093,428 in January 2025 to $747,655,527 in January 2026, according to the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB). 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES 
Nevada’s nonrestricted gaming licensees reported a total gaming win of roughly $1.35 billion in January of this year, dropping 6.55% compared to the same month last year, according to the NGCB. 
The online gambling market is expected to reach a projected revenue of $22.2 million by 2030, according to Grand View Research. 
Harrison said there's been a shift in Vegas since back in the day. 
"The rooms weren't expensive. 
You had great entertainment. 
[It] wasn't crazy money. 
The food wasn't expensive; they made most of their money off the gambling," he said. 
"Nowadays, younger people don't gamble as much, so you have to change your business model, how you're going to make money," said Harrison. 
"In the end, you have to think about the customer experience." 
In 2025, there were about 38.5 million visitors, a 7.5% drop from 2024 according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCA). 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Robby Starbuck, a conservative activist and the host of "The Robby Starbuck Show," previously told Fox News Digital that in-person gambling is becoming less popular. 
"Now nearly everyone under 40 who bets seems to do it online," Starbuck said. 
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ 
"I don’t know one person under age 40 who goes to Vegas regularly to bet or play slots," he added. 
"This trend will continue with younger people because, honestly, our minds are wired differently." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Ashley DiMella: 4.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Ashley DiMella: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 8.5%Ashley DiMella: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic8.5%This article: 3.8%Ashley DiMella: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.8%This article: 5.8%Ashley DiMella: 5.5%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 6.6%Ashley DiMella: 11.1%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.5%Ashley DiMella: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Ashley DiMella: 10.2%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 1.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.7%Ashley DiMella: 6.9%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias24.7%This article: 6.0%Ashley DiMella: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 1.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Ashley DiMella: 0.8%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Ashley DiMella: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.1%Ashley DiMella: 7.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority10.1%This article: 7.0%Ashley DiMella: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.3%Ashley DiMella: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning4.3%This article: 8.3%Ashley DiMella: 8.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization8.3%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.8%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion2.0%This article: 2.3%Ashley DiMella: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 11.9%Ashley DiMella: 3.8%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.7%Ashley DiMella: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 5.0%Ashley DiMella: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature5.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.9%Ashley DiMella: 4.4%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal16.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.6%Ashley DiMella: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 4.7%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.1%Ashley DiMella: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley DiMella: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Ashley DiMella: 5.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.0%

603 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers73%attributed speech161writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 36 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageVital Vegas • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 7 words • 0.0% coverageNevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageNevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) • 31 words • 0.0% coverageGrand View Research • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRick Harrison • 11 words • 100.0% coverageLas Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCA) • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageRobby Starbuck • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRobby Starbuck • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageRobby Starbuck • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRobby Starbuck • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Robby Starbuck

100%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words17% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination+19.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Robby Starbuck: 19.2%19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.6 ptsWriter: 18.6%Robby Starbuck: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.