Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 2,312 hits . Analysis detected 20,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,106 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (15,009 of 16,562 topics). This Las Vegas is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Las Vegas
Topic details
Total words: 27,106
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst