Topic summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These G7 Summit results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 1,236 hits . Analysis detected 15,397 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,065 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,304 topics). This G7 Summit is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. G7 Summit
Topic details
Total words: 23,065
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst