Topic summary
74% 15 analyzed articles/videos 13,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food & Drink results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 5,659 hits . Analysis detected 65,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 71,772 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,658 of 15,769 topics). This Food & Drink is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Food & Drink
Topic details
Total words: 71,772
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score15 analyzed articles71.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst