Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Carpenter results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 2,768 hits. Analysis detected 12,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,720 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,708 of 6,463 authors). This Shannon Carpenter is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Shannon Carpenter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Shannon Carpenter (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,720
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.5%11.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.6%15.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate