Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Hatchett results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 3,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (5,167 of 6,164 authors). This Caroline Hatchett is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Caroline Hatchett
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠17%Caroline Hatchett (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,664
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos