Author summary
89%1 analyzed article/video412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian McNulty results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 636 hits. Analysis detected 1,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (454 of 6,316 authors). This Ian McNulty is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Ian McNulty
Author details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed authors
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often