Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Jess Lander results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 1,495 hits . Analysis detected 5,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,408 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Jess Lander is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jess Lander
Author details
Total words: 7,408
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 20.2% 20.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.2%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst