Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Simon results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,324 hits . Analysis detected 17,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,974 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,467 of 6,296 authors). This Scott Simon is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Scott Simon
Author details
Total words: 15,974
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst