STLPR0%

Judy Blume says she's done writing: '50 years is enough!' 6%

By Scott Simon0%

6/20/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 600 faulty-reasoning hits from 705 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,717 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the article peer group.

Judy Blume is the legendary writer of books for young adults including Are You There God It's Me Margaret, Deenie, Tiger Eyes, Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing and Blubber. 
Her last book, 2015's In The Unlikely Event, was published more than a decade ago. 
Blume now spends her time reading children's books behind the counter at her bookstore in Key West, Florida. 
Though she says she is done writing, her books remain beloved; her readers numerous and devoted. 
Judy Blume spoke with NPR's Scott Simon at the Santa Fe International Literary Festival in May. 
Here are excerpts from that conversation, edited in parts for clarity and length. 
Scott Simon: How did you begin to write? 
What do you think made you a writer? 
Judy Blume: I was a reader. 
And, you know, I meet so many kids and they say, "I want to be a writer when I grow up, but I don't like to read." 
And I say, "You know what? 
Forget being a writer." 
Because I think every writer  that I know anyway  grew up a reader. 
And certainly that was true for me. 
Simon: What was the spark that set it in motion from reading to writing, do you think? 
Blume: I was married young. 
I had two kids young. 
And I was desperate for a creative outlet. 
I loved taking care of babies, but I needed something else and it could have been anything. 
Simon: I have read that at one point in your life you made felt art pieces? 
Blume: Oh God, my first career. 
You know, I stopped because the Elmer's glue  I'm an allergic person  started to give me funny things on the tips of my fingers. 
I made $300 selling those. 
And I bought myself a small electric typewriter. 
And the rest is history. 
But I always had stories inside my head  when I was 9 years old. 
I bounced a rubber ball against the side of my house for hours. 
But really what was going on were stories. 
Fabulous stories, very melodramatic. 
I never told anybody. 
I never asked a friend, "Hey, do you have stories inside your head all the time?" 
Because I thought they'd think I was weird, which I might have been. 
So the stories were always there. 
Simon: When you were writing, what was the process like for you? 
Blume: Well, I kept a notebook for each book and I scribbled everything in it. 
Everything, everything, everything for a long time. 
For months. 
And then on the day that I feel ready to start, well, that's either the scariest part of writing or the best. 
Because, you know, when you have a good day  I mean, I had kids, and I would sit down at the dinner table and I would say, like, "You will never believe what Tony did today." 
Because they're real. 
They're real to you. 
And you're living with them for months, sometimes years. 
And you're locked up in a little room all day with them. 
That's why 50 years is enough. 
I was ready to come out into the world. 
But I have found another career that I love dearly. 
I have a bookstore and I love that. 
Simon: I get the idea that you, at least for the moment, don't miss writing right now. 
Blume: I don't miss writing but I'm very glad that I wrote. 
I mean, writing changed my life. 
But it was time to let it go. 
Could I have come up with more ideas and written more books? 
Yes. 
But I'm really happy that I found something else that I love to do. 
Simon: Do characters ever come calling on you? 
Blume: No. 
They know better. 
They're quiet. 
You know how many letters I get? 
"We need Judy to write a book  Margaret In Menopause." 
Margaret is always going to be 12. 
She's not knocking, saying, "Let me out. 
I'm in menopause!" 
They are what they are. 
They stay in the book. 
They stay in the book. 
They live for me in the book. 
And then I have to let them go. 
Copyright 2026 NPR 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.7%Scott Simon: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Scott Simon: 6.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.9%Scott Simon: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.9%This article: 0.7%Scott Simon: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Scott Simon: 9.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 2.6%Scott Simon: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 3.7%Scott Simon: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.9%Scott Simon: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.9%This article: 2.6%Scott Simon: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 1.8%Scott Simon: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 3.3%Scott Simon: 7.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias3.3%This article: 4.1%Scott Simon: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias4.1%This article: 0.4%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 3.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Scott Simon: 10.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Scott Simon: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 6.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.7%Scott Simon: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma3.7%This article: 1.1%Scott Simon: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope1.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Scott Simon: 5.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Scott Simon: 14.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 1.6%Scott Simon: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question1.6%This article: 5.2%Scott Simon: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.1%Scott Simon: 6.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal7.1%This article: 1.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.0%This article: 6.7%Scott Simon: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.4%Scott Simon: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote5.4%This article: 1.4%Scott Simon: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 0.6%Scott Simon: 7.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 2.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Scott Simon: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

705 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers81%attributed speech137writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 4 words • 100.0% coverageJudy Blume • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 17 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 100.0% coverageScott Simon • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 14 words • 0.0% coverageScott Simon • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJudy Blume • 8 words • 0.0% coverageNPR • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Judy Blume

64%flagged-word coverage
475 attributed words84% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-2.3 ptsWriter: 8.0%Judy Blume: 5.7%5.7%Quote-first Misdirection-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Judy Blume: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +1.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Judy Blume: 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer Voice+0.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Judy Blume: 0.8%0.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.