Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Pak results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 2,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,894 of 6,244 authors). This Jennifer Pak is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Jennifer Pak
Author details
Total words: 2,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst