Opinion: A well-deserved statue for a hero rat 79%

By Scott Simon0%

4/11/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 720 faulty-reasoning hits from 358 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,699 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the article peer group.

A large statue of a small national hero was unveiled this week in Cambodia 
Seven-feet tall and hand-carved from stone, the statue commemorates the life, and lives saved, by a real rat. 
Magawa was an African giant pouched rat. 
He sniffed out more than 100 land mines as a 'heroRAT' working for Apopo, a Belgian non-profit group that's training animals to help clear minefields left from the wars of the 1970s and 1980s. 
In some ways, Cambodia's wars have never quite ended. 
According to the UK-based charity Halo Trust, since 1979, land mines buried during the Khmer Rouge era and the Vietnamese occupation have killed more than 18,000 people, and injured more than 45,000. 
Rats are trained and deployed to locate land mines because they have superb and specific qualifications. 
They have a powerful sense of smell, which can detect chemical compounds in explosives, and they are not distracted by mere scrap metal. 
And rats don't weigh much, so they don't set off land mines. 
Magawa was just three pounds. 
Rats are also highly intelligent. 
"Magawa was one of the best rats we've ever had," Michael Raine, who works for Apopo in Cambodia, told the Washington Post. 
"Magawa was calm and focused. 
He was curious, very composed, and quick at work. 
He knew his job." 
Over his five-year career, Magawa helped clear about 1.5 million square feet, one of Apopo's most successful 'HeroRATS'. 
I have done stories following Cambodian de-miners. 
It can be extraordinary and moving to see rats sniff and scratch at a land mine that might have been buried 50 years ago, alerting their handlers, who reward them with a small treat, like bananas or peanuts. 
The landmines are then safely demolished. 
When Magawa retired in 2021, at the old rat age of eight, he apparently helped younger rats develop detection skills. 
Rats can learn by observing other rats. 
He died peacefully the next year. 
Apopo says more than six million land mines may still be buried in the soil of Cambodia. 
Magawa helped Cambodians personify a partnership of rats and humans that may continue to save lives. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 2.1%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Scott Simon: 0.2%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 16.8%Scott Simon: 6.3%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic16.8%This article: 3.4%Scott Simon: 1.8%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 5.6%Scott Simon: 0.3%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias5.6%This article: 9.5%Scott Simon: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias9.5%This article: 6.1%Scott Simon: 9.6%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.8%Scott Simon: 3.6%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias16.8%This article: 2.5%Scott Simon: 1.6%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 2.5%Scott Simon: 7.0%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 1.3%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 3.1%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Scott Simon: 10.6%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect22.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 2.1%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Scott Simon: 1.7%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.6%Scott Simon: 6.0%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority15.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 2.3%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.9%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 5.3%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.3%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.3%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.8%Scott Simon: 14.5%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion12.8%This article: 8.9%Scott Simon: 1.3%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question8.9%This article: 8.9%Scott Simon: 2.1%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.7%Scott Simon: 0.7%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.6%Scott Simon: 6.3%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal15.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Scott Simon: 1.5%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote1.4%This article: 6.1%Scott Simon: 1.8%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 25.7%Scott Simon: 7.7%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice25.7%This article: 10.6%Scott Simon: 2.6%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination10.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.7%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Simon: 0.9%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

358 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech269writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageHalo Trust • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Raine • 22 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Raine • 5 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Raine • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Raine • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageApopo • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Raine

100%flagged-word coverage
40 attributed words45% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+55.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michael Raine: 55.0%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-34.2 ptsWriter: 34.2%Michael Raine: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Michael Raine: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+12.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michael Raine: 12.5%12.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.