Topic summary
59% 9 analyzed articles/videos 7,474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Consumption results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 3,477 hits . Analysis detected 33,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,210 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,895 of 16,562 topics). This Energy Consumption is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group. Energy Consumption
Topic details
Total words: 34,210
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles34.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst