Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Edwards results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 3,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,053 of 6,350 authors). This Joe Edwards is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Joe Edwards
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠84%Joe Edwards (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,696
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.2%17.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.9%16.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos