Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maarten Boudry results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,854 hits . Analysis detected 7,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,009 of 6,360 authors). This Maarten Boudry is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Maarten Boudry
Author details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.9% 33.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.4% 13.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Straw Man: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst