Topic summary
45% 53 analyzed articles/videos 25,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 12,339 hits . Analysis detected 111,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 133,519 analyzed words across 53 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (13,789 of 15,142 topics). This Energy is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Energy
Topic details
Total words: 133,519
Article count: 53
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score53 analyzed articles133.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst