Author summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily L. Mahoney results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 2,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,277 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,211 of 6,197 authors). This Emily L. Mahoney is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Emily L. Mahoney
Author details
Total words: 2,277
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst