Author summary
21%1 analyzed article/video1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Jaffe results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,940 of 6,169 authors). This Mark Jaffe is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Mark Jaffe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
20%Mark Jaffe (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos