Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Neil Winton results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 641 hits. Analysis detected 3,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,529 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,171 authors). This Neil Winton is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Neil Winton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Neil Winton (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,529
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.6%18.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.4%25.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 8.2%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos