Topic summary
80% 13 analyzed articles/videos 7,622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Growth results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 2,757 hits . Analysis detected 37,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,237 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (10,432 of 15,546 topics). This Economic Growth is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Economic Growth
Topic details
Total words: 31,237
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles31.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst