Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Franklin results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 677 hits . Analysis detected 3,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of â 78% (1,463 of 6,461 authors). This Peter Franklin is worse (more manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Peter Franklin
Author details
Total words: 2,176
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.1% 31.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 16.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst