BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 2,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 754 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.8% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,369 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the article peer group.

Small businesses and startups are the heart of America's economy. 
The number of employees, after all, at a company like General Motors may not change all that much from year to year, but a new small business starting up may have one employee the first month, three after a year, and 20 a year later, if things go well. 
That's where job growth comes from. 
That's where wealth is produced and earned. 
And now, in the first half of 2026, the American economy has seen the creation of 3.5 million new businesses. 
Registered Agents Inc., a business formation service provider, released its June 2026 business report. 
It found that the U.S. added 3,493,381 businesses in the first six months of 2026, despite economic pressures and uncertainty in global markets. 
The month of June alone showed an increase of 548,060 businesses, a greater increase over the June 2021 post-pandemic surge of 509,474. 
The June 2026 increase is also substantially more than June 2025, where the economy added 490,265 businesses. 
Overall business growth also exceeded the same time period as last year. 
The economy had a 12% year-over-year increase compared to the same time period in 2025. 
Even in the summer now underway, when business growth usually drops off some, the American economy stayed stable, The Center Square story on the report, linked above, said. 
This represents 442,415 more businesses than the first half of last year, illustrating a massive wave of nearly half a million more entrepreneurs stepping up to build against a backdrop of economic uncertainty and job-market squeezes,” the report reads. 
Typically, the report said, the summer season shows a dip in business creation. 
However, this year’s business growth showed to be more flat than deflated. 
“June capped off a truly remarkable first half of the year for entrepreneurship in America,” said Molly Cavanah, vice president of Revenue Growth and Data at Registered Agents Inc. 
“While people continue to navigate inflation and higher interest rates, record-breaking formation activity reflects a strong sense of confidence and determination among new business owners.” 
Why is this important? 
Because it speaks to confidence in the American economy, and more so than the usually-touted consumer confidence. 
Oh, consumer confidence is important, too, and worth watching, but the new business startup figure takes into account the number of people willing to invest considerable time and resources starting up a business, and being willing to take a risk that, if it fails, it could cost everything. 
That takes a whole new level of confidence in the economy. 
What's interesting about this is that it isn't exactly the most stable business climate the United States has ever seen. 
We're in the middle of combat operations with Iran, the world's foremost state sponsor of Islamic terrorism. 
The President, only earlier this week, brought us details of what we can only describe as massive interference in our elections, much of that coming from China, our primary geopolitical rival. 
Democrats in Congress and out are shouting doom and gloom at every turn, until it's enough to make one look up to see if the sky really is falling. 
And yet, people are starting up new businesses at a record-breaking pace. 
Some of the greatest growth comes from places we might not expect, but it's still good: 
Registered Agents Inc. also analyzed how all 50 states were adapting to the business growth trends. 
The report found Oregon took the lead in June 2026 with a 53% year-over-year increase in business formation from the same time period in 2025. 
More than 8,000 businesses were included in Oregon’s growth total. 
“Industries like construction, manufacturing, and hospitality may be driving new formations as skilled workers move towards ownership rather than employment,” the report reads. 
Mississippi and North Dakota also had some of the highest year-over-year increases for business growth at 46% and 44%, respectively. 
There's another tidbit in this report that may provide some advice for young people starting: Two of the hottest industries are construction and manufacturing. 
In the next few years, a skilled welder, carpenter, or mechanic may have much better job and business prospects than many a college graduate. 
And, yes, this is what we voted for. 
Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump’s leadership and bold policies, America’s economy is back on track. 
Help us continue to report on the president’s economic successes and combat the lies of the Democrats. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.7%Ward Clark: 6.5%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias16.7%This article: 1.3%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.3%This article: 15.8%Ward Clark: 4.6%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic15.8%This article: 2.1%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Ward Clark: 3.1%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 9.0%Ward Clark: 8.2%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.4%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.4%This article: 1.1%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.1%This article: 6.5%Ward Clark: 3.0%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 4.1%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 11.9%Ward Clark: 9.5%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias11.9%This article: 5.3%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 3.1%Ward Clark: 0.5%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Ward Clark: 5.7%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias7.2%This article: 3.8%Ward Clark: 1.9%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.8%This article: 1.3%Ward Clark: 1.5%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 2.7%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Ward Clark: 3.9%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem6.1%This article: 3.8%Ward Clark: 2.0%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man3.8%This article: 3.8%Ward Clark: 2.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 5.4%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma5.4%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.1%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.1%This article: 21.5%Ward Clark: 10.6%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization21.5%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.9%Ward Clark: 6.7%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion21.9%This article: 2.3%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question2.3%This article: 17.2%Ward Clark: 1.8%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.2%This article: 3.3%Ward Clark: 1.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque3.3%This article: 8.6%Ward Clark: 1.0%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof8.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.7%Ward Clark: 2.8%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal11.7%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.1%Ward Clark: 1.6%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.8%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote6.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 24.4%Ward Clark: 19.9%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice24.4%This article: 17.1%Ward Clark: 6.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination17.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Ward Clark: 12.3%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.8%This article: 6.0%Ward Clark: 2.9%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

754 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers28%attributed speech546writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRegistered Agents Inc. • 14 words • 100.0% coverageRegistered Agents Inc. • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageThe Center Square • 28 words • 100.0% coverageRegistered Agents Inc. • 39 words • 100.0% coverageRegistered Agents Inc. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageMolly Cavanah • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMolly Cavanah • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRegistered Agents Inc. • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageRedState VIP • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Center Square

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words13% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%The Center Square: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -26.0 ptsWriter: 26.0%The Center Square: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-23.6 ptsWriter: 23.6%The Center Square: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%The Center Square: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%The Center Square: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.