Speaker summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos16.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Center Square results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 80% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 16.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 85% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,981 of 28,364 speakers). This The Center Square is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
The Center Square
Speaker details
Total words: 16.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
85.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos16.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 80.0%80.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 80.0%80.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 80.0%80.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 80.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos