Topic summary
76% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Homeland Security results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,549 hits . Analysis detected 22,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,819 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,425 of 16,562 topics). This Department Of Homeland Security is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Department Of Homeland Security
Topic details
Total words: 19,819
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst