Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Phillip results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,551 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,965 of 6,169 authors). This David Phillip is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. David Phillip
Author details
Total words: 1,551
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst