Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos5,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyche Hendricks results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 3,634 hits. Analysis detected 24,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,186 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,874 of 6,359 authors). This Tyche Hendricks is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Tyche Hendricks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
55%Tyche Hendricks (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,186
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate