Topic summary
79% 20 analyzed articles/videos 12,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democrats results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 10,300 hits . Analysis detected 94,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,213 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,154 of 15,445 topics). This Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Democrats
Topic details
Total words: 84,213
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score20 analyzed articles84.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst