Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jill Keppeler results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 1,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,275 authors). This Jill Keppeler is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jill Keppeler
Author details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 13.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst