Publication summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UPI results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 4,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,223 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (62 of 379 publications). This UPI is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
UPI
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
84%UPI (selected)4%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 3,223
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Publication 6.7%6.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 8.1%8.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Publication 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 20.5%20.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos