Topic summary
54% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crime And Justice results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,528 hits . Analysis detected 17,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,510 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,059 of 16,562 topics). This Crime And Justice is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group. Crime And Justice
Topic details
Total words: 15,510
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst