Topic summary
54%6 analyzed articles/videos1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crime And Justice results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,528 hits. Analysis detected 17,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,510 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (9,059 of 16,562 topics). This Crime And Justice is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate