A Philly judge accused of domestic violence is no longer suspended after all charges were dropped 28%

By Abraham Gutman15%

7/24/2026, 3:02:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 339 faulty-reasoning hits from 374 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,870 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

A Philadelphia Family Court judge who was arrested for assaulting his wife and daughter earlier this year is no longer suspended after prosecutors withdrew all charges against him last week. 
The Pennsylvania Court of Discipline ended Michael Fanning’s suspension without pay Thursday because the only reason for it was the criminal charges against him. 
“With no charges and no other reason cited for the suspension of Judge Fanning, no reason exists for that suspension to continue,” the order said. 
Fanning, 60, will be assigned administrative duty and will not hear cases until the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas leadership can decide his future assignment, said court spokesperson Martin O’Rourke. 
His request to end the stay did not mention backpay. 
The administrative office of Pennsylvania courts did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Fanning would receive back pay for the four months he was suspended. 
Fortunato Perri Jr., Fanning’s attorney, declined to comment. 
Fanning was charged with aggravated assault, strangulation, and related crimes in March after prosecutors said he repeatedly punched his wife in the face, choked her, and dragged his 30-year-old daughter to the ground by her hair, causing her to cut her face, during a fight at their East Torresdale home. 
Assistant District Attorney Brian Collins said last week that the two women were evaluated by medics and did not suffer injuries. 
The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office withdrew the charges against the judge last week after Fanning’s wife and daughter did not want to proceed. 
Attorneys for Fanning also provided the district attorney’s office with “extensive mitigation” records, prosecutors told the court without describing their content. 
Fanning’s wife said in a March hearing that the judge had voluntarily entered a 30-day inpatient recovery program to treat his excessive alcohol use, an issue the family had worked to address in the past. 
Fanning was appointed to the Common Pleas Court bench in 2014 by then-Gov. 
Tom Corbett. 
He won a 10-year term in the 2015 election, and was retained for another term in November. 
He has been serving as a Family Court judge throughout his tenure. 
Staff writer Ellie Rushing contributed to this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.4%Abraham Gutman: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias13.4%This article: 5.6%Abraham Gutman: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias5.6%This article: 7.8%Abraham Gutman: 3.3%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic7.8%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.1%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Abraham Gutman: 9.4%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.4%Abraham Gutman: 4.4%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias21.4%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 3.5%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Abraham Gutman: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 2.2%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.4%Abraham Gutman: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning6.4%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 3.6%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.7%Abraham Gutman: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question6.7%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 2.1%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Abraham Gutman: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.6%Abraham Gutman: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice5.6%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Abraham Gutman: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

374 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers44%attributed speech208writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coveragePennsylvania Court of Discipline • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePennsylvania Court of Discipline • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMartin O’Rourke • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFortunato Perri Jr. • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Collins • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePhiladelphia District Attorney’s Office • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageFanning’s wife • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words30% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-10.1 ptsWriter: 10.1%Pennsylvania Court of Discipline: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.1 ptsWriter: 10.1%Pennsylvania Court of Discipline: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.