Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Court of Discipline results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, with Circular Reasoning as the most egregious example at 66.2% saturation with 32.777 hits. Analysis detected 57.777 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,616 of 28,364 speakers). This Pennsylvania Court of Discipline is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Pennsylvania Court of Discipline
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 66.2%66.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 33.8%33.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 66.2%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 1.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos