The Blaze79%

Boy, 9, witnesses armed robbery while at bank to open his first checking account; his grandmom calls his response 'surreal' 20%

By Dave Urbanski32%

7/22/2026, 11:45:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Loss Aversion, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 361 faulty-reasoning hits from 448 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,603 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the article peer group.

July 13 was shaping up to be a big day in the life of a 9-year-old Arizona boy named Hunter. 
You see, on that day Hunter entered the Mesa Bank of America with his grandmother, Colette, to open his very first checking account, KNXV-TV reported . 
'You can't let your fear guide you; you have to meet it head-on.' 
Hunter  a bespectacled, blond-haired kid headed into the fourth grade  had spent the week doing work at his grandparents' house and earned just under $200, the station said, adding that his grandmom suggested they deposit Hunter's cash in the bank. 
But it turns out Hunter's big day also would be unforgettable for a rather scary reason. 
KNXV said Hunter spotted someone entering the bank wearing a mask  but instead of panicking, Hunter reacted with courage well beyond his years. 
"He just walked up and tapped me on the shoulder," Colette told KNXV, adding that she noticed "the calmness in his demeanor, it was surreal. 
I just turned my head and saw the teller there with something pointed at her head." 
That something was a knife, KNXV reported. 
With that, Hunter and his grandmother got under a desk for safety and didn't hear the suspect say anything during the robbery, the station said. 
"I did not hear anything; All I heard was my Nana's breathing really hard," Hunter recalled to KNXV. 
Truth be told, the station said Hunter also was thinking about his hard-earned cash  $160 of his own money plus $27 in change from Colette. 
"If I lose it, $160 down the drain!" 
Hunter explained to KNXV. 
That same day, Mesa police arrested a woman who tried to rob the bank, the station said, adding that she was booked on charges of felony armed robbery, aggravated assault, and disorderly conduct. 
Police said no one was injured, KNXV reported. 
RELATED: Blaze News original: 10 inspiring examples of Good Samaritans who ran toward danger to help others, often defeating bad guys 
After giving police a statement, Hunter and his grandmother returned to the Bank of America the very next day to open his checking account, the station said. 
"You can't let your fear guide you; you have to meet it head-on," Colette told KNXV. 
When the station asked Hunter what his first debit card purchase would be, he replied that he wants to buy his grandmother a new keyboard  and maybe soon a computer for himself. 
But when KNXV asked him what he would say to the bank robber, Hunter's reply was blunt: "Get a job." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Dave Urbanski: 4.9%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Dave Urbanski: 5.2%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 7.6%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion7.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 1.8%Dave Urbanski: 0.7%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 12.5%Dave Urbanski: 11.4%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.8%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Dave Urbanski: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Dave Urbanski: 1.9%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 3.5%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.5%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma4.5%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.2%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 4.7%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.9%Dave Urbanski: 4.2%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion2.9%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.2%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.6%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 2.3%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 1.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.7%Dave Urbanski: 4.1%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 2.9%Dave Urbanski: 2.5%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.9%This article: 5.6%Dave Urbanski: 6.2%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice5.6%This article: 3.6%Dave Urbanski: 2.4%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination3.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 0.5%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Urbanski: 3.1%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

448 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers35%attributed speech293writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageColette • 25 words • 100.0% coverageColette • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKNXV • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHunter • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageHunter • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHunter • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKNXV • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageColette • 16 words • 100.0% coverageHunter • 33 words • 0.0% coverageHunter • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Colette

72%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words37% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice+43.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Colette: 43.9%43.9%Indoctrination+28.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Colette: 28.1%28.1%Unattributed Quote-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Colette: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Colette: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.