Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Marie Gottschalk results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,282 hits . Analysis detected 14,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Marie Gottschalk is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Marie Gottschalk
Author details
Total words: 9,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.3% 23.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.3% 16.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.8%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst