Topic summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coaching results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,038 hits . Analysis detected 16,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,015 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,051 of 15,780 topics). This Coaching is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group. Coaching
Topic details
Total words: 14,015
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst