Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catharine Richert results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,887 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,042 of 6,613 authors). This Catharine Richert is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Catharine Richert
Author details
Total words: 1,887
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.7% 11.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst