As Rochester’s chess scene grows, one high school team is eyeing another statewide title52%

By Catharine Richert0%

12/26/2025, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 264 faulty-reasoning hits from 631 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,207 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the article peer group.

Some schools have academic accolades; others have powerhouse sports teams. 
In Rochester, one area high school is becoming known for its formidable chess team. 
Century High School was a statewide champion last year, and on a recent December afternoon, Century hosted the first of seven Rochester city-wide chess meets in advance of the state championship in the spring. 
In a media room, students sat across from each other in pairs, staring intently at the boards in front of them, gaming out how they would next move their pawn, knight, bishop or rook. 
Eventually, there will be a playoff for a traveling trophy that migrates annually to the winningest school’s trophy case. 
Century currently lays claim to that trophy and many more from other past chess tournaments. 
A big part of that success can be credited to coach Chuck Handlon. 
He’s taught the game and worked with chess players at Century and other schools around Rochester for 26 years. 
It’s a life-long passion for him. 
“When I was in elementary school in the late ‘60s, Bobby Fisher was the wunderkind, and chess was becoming popular, and I learned it,” he said. 
As coach, Handlon’s biggest job is to keep the kids motivated. 
They practice together after school and online when they’re at home. 
After every tournament, Handlon has them dissect and analyze their moves to figure out what went right and understand what went wrong. 
“And sometimes it's just psychology. 
Kids having a rough time, and it's like, ‘Hey, you know you lost those few games. 
Let's sit down, go over it and do better next time here.’” 
Handlon taught chemistry at Century for decades. 
In that role, he talked up the game to his students. 
Handlon is retired now. 
But he can’t quit chess; he loves the game too much. 
And Handlon is still cultivating a pipeline of new players, recruiting middle schoolers to learn the game so they can join the team when they start ninth grade. 
He and other area youth chess coaches are also focused on welcoming players who may feel like the game isn't for them  such as young women. 
During the recent tournament at Century, Mayo High School senior Giada Barnes was practicing her moves in a classroom. 
She said playing chess helps her in other favorite sport, soccer. 
“[Chess] kind of opens my mind, and makes me feel at ease,” Barnes said. 
“It’s like ‘think before you pass’ in soccer. 
[Chess is] ‘think before you move.’” 
Barnes was playing a practice round against Century sophomore Ezra Mengesha. 
He’s not on the team, but he comes to practice for fun. 
“This game is over 1,000 years old. 
I'm playing the same game that Genghis Khan played. 
That’s crazy,” Mengesha said. 
“It’s way better than any phone game. 
It’s better than people who go home and  play Fortnite.” 
As they wrapped up their matches, chess players filtered into the practice room. 
Century sophomore Johan Myburgh was among the players that helped his school win that statewide title last spring. 
“I was just super nervous, but I actually came out with a win, and that was great, because that supported the team, and that's how we got the co-champion title,” he said. 
Sophomore Joshua Wang was on that championship team, too. 
He said he wasn’t a chess natural at first. 
Now, chess strategy is always playing out in his head. 
“At the start of every tournament, I just think to myself, ‘Chess is a game, so I'm just going to be on the board. 
I'm just playing my best chess,’” Wang said. 
Wang and Myburgh are both excited to try for another championship this spring. 
In the meantime, they’re working through their moves, their strategies and their sometimes shaky nerves. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.5%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 5.4%MPR News: 4.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 3.2%MPR News: 6.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.6%MPR News: 4.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Catharine Richert: 4.0%MPR News: 25.4%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 1.4%MPR News: 2.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.1%Catharine Richert: 11.7%MPR News: 7.7%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 3.5%Catharine Richert: 8.3%MPR News: 1.8%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 4.2%MPR News: 11.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 4.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.8%MPR News: 18.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Catharine Richert: 5.8%MPR News: 8.2%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 4.8%MPR News: 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Catharine Richert: 1.7%MPR News: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 2.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.5%MPR News: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 6.0%MPR News: 3.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 2.8%MPR News: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.1%Catharine Richert: 6.3%MPR News: 6.0%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 2.0%MPR News: 2.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 2.1%MPR News: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Catharine Richert: 1.7%MPR News: 1.7%Ad Hominem1.8%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.4%MPR News: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 6.1%MPR News: 5.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 1.4%Catharine Richert: 4.1%MPR News: 9.6%Appeal to Authority1.4%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 2.4%MPR News: 15.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 1.4%MPR News: 2.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.9%Catharine Richert: 1.0%MPR News: 0.5%Composition/Division2.9%This article: 2.9%Catharine Richert: 3.3%MPR News: 1.4%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.4%Catharine Richert: 1.4%MPR News: 1.1%Genetic Fallacy1.4%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 5.4%MPR News: 5.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.7%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.2%Catharine Richert: 7.0%MPR News: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 1.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.5%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.8%Catharine Richert: 0.6%MPR News: 0.6%Straw Man1.8%This article: 0.0%Catharine Richert: 0.0%MPR News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%

625 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.