Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Championship results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,887 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,471 of 16,504 topics). This State Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
State Championship
Topic details
Total words: 1,887
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.7%11.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos