Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Grace McCarron results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 759 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,427 authors). This Grace McCarron is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Grace McCarron
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Grace McCarron (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 8.8%8.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Circular Reasoning: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos