Topic summary
46%11 analyzed articles/videos16,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Capitalism results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 7,641 hits. Analysis detected 58,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,609 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,251 of 16,408 topics). This Capitalism is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles58.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate