Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael G. Vann results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,769 hits . Analysis detected 13,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,060 of 6,263 authors). This Michael G. Vann is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Michael G. Vann
Author details
Total words: 13,164
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst