Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniele Tavani results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 521 hits . Analysis detected 3,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,362 authors). This Daniele Tavani is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniele Tavani
Author details
Total words: 3,556
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.7% 14.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst