Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ingeborg Glimmer results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 2,712 hits . Analysis detected 11,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Ingeborg Glimmer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ingeborg Glimmer
Author details
Total words: 6,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.2% 42.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 19.6% 19.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.5% 13.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 12.2%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst