Author summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Huber results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 2,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,229 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,278 of 6,359 authors). This Matt Huber is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Matt Huber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠80%Matt Huber (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,229
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 22.0%22.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos