Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blockade results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,143 hits. Analysis detected 22,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,076 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (13,775 of 15,501 topics). This Blockade is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos