Topic summary
40% 28 analyzed articles/videos 6,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biotechnology results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,606 hits . Analysis detected 34,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,648 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,131 of 15,535 topics). This Biotechnology is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Biotechnology
Topic details
Total words: 34,648
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score28 analyzed articles34.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst