Author summary
⁠25%3 analyzed articles/videos744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allison DeAngelis results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,810 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (3,200 of 6,350 authors). This Allison DeAngelis is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Allison DeAngelis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠50%Allison DeAngelis (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,810
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos