Author summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 631 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Chen results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 217 hits . Analysis detected 1,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,358 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,363 of 6,275 authors). This Elaine Chen is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Elaine Chen
Author details
Total words: 2,358
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst