Author summary
42% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Feuerstein results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 941 hits . Analysis detected 5,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,178 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,142 of 6,257 authors). This Adam Feuerstein is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Adam Feuerstein
Author details
Total words: 6,178
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst