Author summary
74%4 analyzed articles/videos766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reed Albergotti results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 6,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,094 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,847 of 6,194 authors). This Reed Albergotti is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Reed Albergotti
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%Reed Albergotti (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,094
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos